请详细谈谈
同求~~~ 原帖由 小白 于 2011-4-13 23:01 发表 http://bbs.headphoneclub.com/images/common/back.gif
等8492参与设计的ESOTERIC机器。:lol
这个，84进ESOTERIC了？:funk: :funk: :funk: 原帖由 小白 于 2011-4-13 23:01 发表 http://bbs.headphoneclub.com/images/common/back.gif
等8492参与设计的ESOTERIC机器。:lol
果真如此，于84本人，于本坛，于世界hi-end产业，均善莫大焉。:) 一般厂家的产品目录栏一般都是图片+介绍+specs 为多，
FM 产品首页不贴产品介绍，却来了这么一段：
Specifications are often misused, misunderstood, or utilized only to sell a product instead of indicating its actual performance capabilities. "Typical" specifications will not tell you much about the true value of a certain component. Only guaranteed minimum data as specified for all FM ACOUSTICS products, together with carefully controlled listening tests, will provide useful information.
Please observe these distinctions if you make comparisons with other product's data sheet.
As an example of the differences: almost all manufacturers quote rise time and slew rate either with no measurement details at all or at an unrealistic level of 1 W into 8 Ohm or so and are therefore able to quote impressive looking data. At FM ACOUSTICS, we quote rise time at full power -3 dB which is certainly much harder and honest than the good-looking but unrealistic 1 W rating of other manufacturers. Another example is power, where you will see absolutely stratospheric power ratings far away from any reality ('500W' units that have a 50W power supply, ghetto blasters rated at "800W" etc.). Even in 'high end' products - that are generally rated a bit more reasonably - actual differences of up to 300% have been experienced.
Compared with other amplifiers of similar power ratings, FM ACOUSTICS power amplifiers drive speakers effortlessly to higher levels. Actual SPL (Sound Pressure Level) differences of between 2 and 8 dB have been documented. This astounding distortion-free dynamic increase is one of the remarkable characteristics of FM ACOUSTICS' power amplifiers.
However, it must be realized that the traditionally used static measurements can never describe the actual capabilities of an FM ACOUSTICS when it is playing dynamic music signals. Bear in mind such differences when comparing data sheets.
FM米不起，但是由通篇对‘TPY specs’ 的痛扁来看，必有其自家自成一体的变态级 Know how，设计经验以及测试验证
回复 51# 的帖子
同篇也就是吹自家驱动能力强:lol 硬总别乱嘌我啦~~我穷学生一个，以后干啥还不知道呢。FM后级驱动力控制力确实强的，世界上最优秀的后级之一了。 fm的前级有这么不堪吗?按照自文的说法fm最便宜的155也可以和mbl旗舰6010d抗衡 顶一个 什么年代的破文章了。用最简单的逻辑推理一下，做的出世界顶级后级的知识储备和智商做出来的前级被说的那么弱鸡，这可能么？也就只能忽悠忽悠传销受骗人士。 战列舰 发表于 2015-11-10 14:57 static/image/common/back.gif
什么年代的破文章了。用最简单的逻辑推理一下，做的出世界顶级后级的知识储备和智商做出来的前级被说的那么 ...
FM这种线路设计比较极端的晶体管前级，不受这些主观听感主导大脑的KOL们待见也是很正常的。话说回来，比声音的活生感和自然度，再贵的晶体管前级，在状态配置均较完备的电子管前级面前，都很难赚到便宜，各家比来比去都是五十笑百而已。 DynaxG 发表于 2015-11-12 16:03
FM这种线路设计比较极端的晶体管前级，不受这些主观听感主导大脑的KOL们待见也是很正常的。话说回来，比声 ...
同意这个说法，268一直是晶体管前级的翘楚 DynaxG 发表于 2015-11-12 16:03
FM这种线路设计比较极端的晶体管前级，不受这些主观听感主导大脑的KOL们待见也是很正常的。话说回来，比声 ...
同意这个说法，268一直是晶体管前级的翘楚
